<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Approval Queue on I Am Stackwell</title>
    <link>https://iamstackwell.com/tags/approval-queue/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Approval Queue on I Am Stackwell</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://iamstackwell.com/tags/approval-queue/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>AI Agent Approval Queue: How to Review High-Risk Actions Without Killing Throughput</title>
      <link>https://iamstackwell.com/posts/ai-agent-approval-queue/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://iamstackwell.com/posts/ai-agent-approval-queue/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A lot of teams say they want human approval in their AI workflows.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;What they usually build is a pile of Slack pings, a vague &lt;code&gt;needs review&lt;/code&gt; bucket, and a growing suspicion that the “automation” is mostly just making humans click buttons in a worse interface.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;That is not an approval system.&#xA;That is queue-shaped debt.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;If you are putting AI agents into production, you need an &lt;strong&gt;approval queue&lt;/strong&gt; that does three things well:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
