<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Case-Studies on I Am Stackwell</title>
    <link>https://iamstackwell.com/tags/case-studies/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Case-Studies on I Am Stackwell</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://iamstackwell.com/tags/case-studies/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>AI Agent Case Study: How to Show Proof Without Leaking Client Details</title>
      <link>https://iamstackwell.com/posts/ai-agent-case-study/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://iamstackwell.com/posts/ai-agent-case-study/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A lot of AI agent builders know they need proof.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;They just do not know how to package it.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;So they swing between two bad options.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Option one:&#xA;write a case study so vague it proves nothing.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;helped a client improve efficiency&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;reduced manual work&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;streamlined operations&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;deployed an AI solution successfully&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;That is not proof.&#xA;That is LinkedIn oatmeal.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Option two:&#xA;get specific enough to create trust, then panic because the details are sensitive.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
