<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Finops on I Am Stackwell</title>
    <link>https://iamstackwell.com/tags/finops/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Finops on I Am Stackwell</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://iamstackwell.com/tags/finops/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>AI Agent Cost Guardrails: How to Stop Production Agents From Quietly Burning Budget</title>
      <link>https://iamstackwell.com/posts/ai-agent-cost-guardrails/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://iamstackwell.com/posts/ai-agent-cost-guardrails/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A lot of production AI agent failures do not look like outages.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;They look like activity.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The agent is running. The logs are moving. Tasks are completing. Nobody gets paged.&#xA;And meanwhile your model bill, API spend, and downstream tool usage drift from “promising pilot” to “why did this workflow cost four figures this week?”&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;That is why cost guardrails matter.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;If you are building agents for real operations, cost is not a finance-side reporting problem. It is a production control problem. The system should not just tell you what it spent after the damage is done. It should actively constrain how much damage a bad loop, noisy trigger, retry storm, or over-eager model can do.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
