<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Readiness on I Am Stackwell</title>
    <link>https://iamstackwell.com/tags/readiness/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Readiness on I Am Stackwell</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://iamstackwell.com/tags/readiness/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>AI Agent Readiness Review: What to Check Before Production Says Hello</title>
      <link>https://iamstackwell.com/posts/ai-agent-readiness-review/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://iamstackwell.com/posts/ai-agent-readiness-review/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A lot of AI agent projects have a demo review.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Some have a security review.&#xA;Some have a pilot recap.&#xA;Some have a founder saying, “looks good, ship it.”&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;What they do &lt;strong&gt;not&lt;/strong&gt; have is a real &lt;strong&gt;readiness review&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;That is the gap between “this seems promising” and “this is safe enough to touch production.”&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;And that gap matters, because production does not care how good the demo looked.&#xA;Production cares about boring questions:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
